
‘Singh, Singh!’ I would scream and jump up and down with joy – I was like a raver on acid. It was so uncommon to see a Singh on the box that if I did see one I would question whether Uncle Malkit had secretly climbed into the TV.
Come to think of it, how many Sikhs who display outward religious symbols do we see today on TV? I can only think of three and I am pushing the boundary in terms of talent. It is late but I am really scraping the ethnic barrel here.
1. Hardeep Singh Kohli (pictured) – clearly a talented individual who appears on the BBC’s One Show. With his extrovert turban often of varying colours (I think the last colour I saw him wearing was purple or maybe it was mauve, lilac or lavender?). He is actually a role model to me. An outward Sikh with an equally outward turban that even my uncle ‘Shipwreck’ would wince at (and they don’t call him shipwreck for nothing I can tell you). A great individual and a brilliant sense of humour.
2. The Sikh with no fashion sense whatsoever who challenged Peggy Mitchell as Walford councillor in Eastenders not too long ago. She subsequently gave an ‘emotional and inspiring’ speech at the councillors session and then collapsed afterwards in the Vic. That awful speech must have really taken it out of her eh? The Singh in question wear a turban that looked like it had been tied by David Blunkett. Religion and politics never mix – lesson learnt.

Is Eastenders a representation of multicultural Britain or purely just a realistic and disappointing interpretation of a London suburb or even the UK? I think the latter. How come there isn’t a Singh family anyway when Punjabi Sikhs make up a massive percentage of the ethnic British population? Maybe I should make a case and send them my credentials as a new Sikh character. I can imagine my story line: Sikh lad enters the Queen Vic and sits within shot of Phil’s barmaid not saying a word while Ben wets himself because Phil just downed his 56th vodka and orange. All this while I chat away to the mute that is ‘Singh in Eastenders’. He is so popular that he even has a facebook fan page (and guess what I’m in it).
A

Lenny Henry recently pointed out that TV when he was growing up was white with only a smattering of black. “America was light years ahead of us when it came to on screen diversity. Unfortunately I wasn’t living in America – I lived in Dudley”. I share his pain, being a fellow West Midlands and Black Country contemporary. Just like Lenny loved to see a black person on TV, I like to see an Asian and more importantly one that is a Sikh – an identifiable Sikh.
I have had my own conflicts with having a turban in the past. I wanted to be like the other cool boys when I was growing up. I told my mum that I was going to cut my hair. The finger prints of my mum’s slap around my face remained for 3 days. Sathnam Sanghera didn’t ask, he just went and cut his hair and then wrote a story about it! ‘The Boy with the Topknot’ was like reading about my own life only my hair stayed where it was.
My serious point is this; on-screen diversity in the UK has come a long way (in my last post I made reference to the many Asian newsreaders I see nowadays!). But as a Sikh, I fear that some stereotypes remain – Sikhs are under-represented by a mile. Does the West still fear the turban? Is the turban threatening and do people liken a turban to Arabian attire? When I have a conversation with somebody and their eyes wander north of my eyes, I sometimes wander what kind of society I live in when I can be judged not by skin colour (the classic) but by an outward religious symbol that now seems to get in the way for some people. It’s fucking annoying. What do you think?

Just because there are more and more ethnic faces on TV, it doesn't mean that society is represented appropriately... Just ask a Sikh.
Call me ignorant if you will but walking around the streets of Birmingham a rather 'diverse' city on any given day I can probably count on one hand the number of under 25 Sikh men I see wearing turbans.
ReplyDeleteIf this is the case then how can the lone Sikh man from EastEnders (who really is an anomaly as he is probably one of the very few Asian petitioners living in the UK that doesn't have all 5 children and 15 grandchildren living in his 3 bedroom semi with him) shock you?
Correct me if I am wrong but isn't it just a sad fact that the turban, whilst being the most outward and identifiable sign on a Sikh just not a hit amongst young British Asian males? After that white son of Zeenat's runs away with all their money will a nice big turban clad family really be any more accurate a portrayal of the Sikh population in the UK?
I would just like to add I mean this across the media not just in EastEnders.
Call me ignorant if you will but walking around the streets of Birmingham a rather 'diverse' city on any given day I can probably count on one hand the number of under 25 Sikh men I see wearing turbans.
ReplyDeleteIf this is the case then how can the lone Sikh man from EastEnders (who really is an anomaly as he is probably one of the very few Asian petitioners living in the UK that doesn't have all 5 children and 15 grandchildren living in his 3 bedroom semi with him) shock you?
Correct me if I am wrong but isn't it just a sad fact that the turban, whilst being the most outward and identifiable sign on a Sikh just not a hit amongst young British Asian males? After that white son of Zeenat's runs away with all their money will a nice big turban clad family really be any more accurate a portrayal of the Sikh population in the UK?
My point is a bigger one where I suggest that there is a fear of the turban within the mainstream industries.
ReplyDeleteIm not sure which Sikh man in Eastenders you are referring to? There were two.
Is the turban shunned by young Sikhs? Maybe it is and yes that is a sad fact. But there is also a massive regeneration of the Sikh faith amongst youngsters in the UK.
A turban clad family in Eastenders? wouldn't that be fun? My point is not that Sikhs should be portrayed accurately, more the fact that race proofing goes as far as adding the token Muslim to TV or the odd brown face (especially since Muslims get the brunt of the bad press in the UK). Its not good enough in my opinion.
What would be an accurate portrayal? - not the power hungry, malicious, devious Sikh that faced Peggy Mitchell and definately one who can master the basics in tying his turban to a sufficient standard - the Eastenders researchers in their attempts to get it right got it wrong.
Hi, just found your blog, very interesting and thought-provoking without being provocative. I'm glad you mentioned Hardeep Singh Kohli, whenever I speak to anyone (generally white) about issues like integration and hear the same tired lines about "why can't they just fit in" I always mention him as a perfect example of someone who is proud of their heritage (being Sikh) but at the same time is equally proud of being British and Scottish.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comments. I think Hardeep Singh Kohli is single-handedly representing Sikhs on TV and doing a damn good job may I add. He showed an alternative side to his persona in the programme about homelessness which was interesting. The Scottish Sikhs adore him and quite rightly so!
ReplyDelete